0
0.0
Jun 24, 2022
06/22
by
CNBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
wade into the law of the land. this cruel ruling is outrageous and heart-wrenching, but make no mistake. again, it's all on the ballot in november the supreme court has ended a constitutional right this is 50 years proclaimed a constitutional right what happened today was historic in many respects historic in that it had not granted recognized the constitutional right and then reversed it. this is a first. and, again, just before it imposed a constitutional right to allow for concealed weapons how about those justices coming before the senators and saying that they respected the precedent of the court, they respected the right of privacy and the constitution of the united states? did you hear that? were they not telling the truth then again, getting to the gun issue because really, in preparation for this morning, i was in an exalted state about what happened in the united states senate yesterday counterpoint to the dangerous decision of this - >> nancy pelosi moving on to gun rights we are staying with the supreme
wade into the law of the land. this cruel ruling is outrageous and heart-wrenching, but make no mistake. again, it's all on the ballot in november the supreme court has ended a constitutional right this is 50 years proclaimed a constitutional right what happened today was historic in many respects historic in that it had not granted recognized the constitutional right and then reversed it. this is a first. and, again, just before it imposed a constitutional right to allow for concealed weapons...
20
20
Jul 19, 2023
07/23
by
CNBC
tv
eye 20
favorite 0
quote 0
law. joining us from the white house is ftc lina khan. good to have you this morning. we were joined on cnbc earlier by john at the doj but let's start off with what are essentially 13 guidelines. your agencies have been delivering the so-called guidelines since 1968. what distinguishes this latest version from the others we've seen? >> it's so great to be here with you. as you noted, the agencies have issued guidelines since 1968. of course, our markets and our economy has changed significantly since then. it's been long-standing practice for the antitrust division and the federal trade commission to periodically issue up dates and revisions to the guidelines to make sure they are fully up-to date and reflecting the reality of how businesses are pursuing mergers and competing in today's economy as well as the most up-to-date state of the law. >> and what is the process from here? specific to how does this actually impact the law and the way it's going to be viewed by the judges who ultima
law. joining us from the white house is ftc lina khan. good to have you this morning. we were joined on cnbc earlier by john at the doj but let's start off with what are essentially 13 guidelines. your agencies have been delivering the so-called guidelines since 1968. what distinguishes this latest version from the others we've seen? >> it's so great to be here with you. as you noted, the agencies have issued guidelines since 1968. of course, our markets and our economy has changed...
207
207
Jun 25, 2015
06/15
by
CNBC
tv
eye 207
favorite 0
quote 1
>> it is the law of the land. until january of 2017, there is not even an opportunity for the law to be repealed as the republicans or some of the republicans would like. for the next two years, we see republicans in congress doing what they can to change the law in a way that will be idealogically more consistent which i think to them will mean less government involvement in health care and allowing markets to operate and allowing consumers to make decisions. we will see it play out in the appropriations process. i don't think that the controversy is over. this is obviously a very big win for the administration. >> david axlerod is out this morning already saying that gopers republicans, he means, are privately relieved at this decision. if they had struck sub sids down they would have been the dogs that caught the car. do you agree? >> i would have some agreement with that statement. it put republicans in a very difficult place. they had yet to come up with an alternative solution. the president was in a very st
>> it is the law of the land. until january of 2017, there is not even an opportunity for the law to be repealed as the republicans or some of the republicans would like. for the next two years, we see republicans in congress doing what they can to change the law in a way that will be idealogically more consistent which i think to them will mean less government involvement in health care and allowing markets to operate and allowing consumers to make decisions. we will see it play out in...
106
106
Oct 30, 2013
10/13
by
CNBC
tv
eye 106
favorite 0
quote 0
this is a law. this was a law passed by both houses of congress, signed by the president of the united states, upheld by the supreme court. the president was reelected, it is the law. and people have benefits and rights under that law and we've got to get that information so they can make good choices for themselves and their families. >> well, thank you. it is the law and frankly i find it disconcerting that my republican colleagues have done nothing but root for this law to fail for the last three and a half years. now there's a big show here of being upset at problems with the web site of keeping people from signing up for coverage fast enough. i would just say to my colleagues on the other side of the aisle, you're really on the wrong side of history here. the web site will be fixed and millions of americans will be able to get quality affordable health insurance coverage through the affordable care act. and, again, i thank you for being here today, madam. >> mr. pitts. chairman of the health co
this is a law. this was a law passed by both houses of congress, signed by the president of the united states, upheld by the supreme court. the president was reelected, it is the law. and people have benefits and rights under that law and we've got to get that information so they can make good choices for themselves and their families. >> well, thank you. it is the law and frankly i find it disconcerting that my republican colleagues have done nothing but root for this law to fail for the...
97
97
Oct 2, 2017
10/17
by
CNBC
tv
eye 97
favorite 0
quote 0
we recall president reagan's assassination attempt and some gun laws, brady laws, came out of that. something does need to be done about certain types of weapons, for example silencers have absolutely no use in civilian society. certain types of -- well, fully automatic weapons are illegal, but way too easy to convert. in this case they were certainly converted to fully automatic, so you wonder what rational purpose is there for ten different assault weapons in the hands of one person so, i mean, from a law enforcement perspective, and i think most law enforcement professionals will say this, people should be allowed to carry guns, but certain assault weapons just don't belong in civilian hands >> you know, you said that this morning. we talked to howard safer, former nypd commissioner this morning, had similar feelings about the right we all have as to personal safety and that there may be some limits on either the amount or type of firearms you can buy it still remains incredibly fraught political argument to make in this country do you think that changes after today? >> you know,
we recall president reagan's assassination attempt and some gun laws, brady laws, came out of that. something does need to be done about certain types of weapons, for example silencers have absolutely no use in civilian society. certain types of -- well, fully automatic weapons are illegal, but way too easy to convert. in this case they were certainly converted to fully automatic, so you wonder what rational purpose is there for ten different assault weapons in the hands of one person so, i...
148
148
Apr 19, 2013
04/13
by
CNBC
tv
eye 148
favorite 0
quote 0
soil, the law enforcement is in full force. this is what they've been planning and practicing for the last 12 years, carl? >> it's true. you always hear about drills. you wonder what is that for? only in achgs is like this does all that preparation, all that money spent become apparent. we'll come back to you in a bit, i'm sure. a lot more "squawk on the street" is back in a minute. you've known? hn we gave people a sticker and had them show us. we learned a lot of us have known someone who's lived well into their 90s. and that's a great thing. but even though we're living longer, one thing that hasn't changed: the official retirement age. ♪ the question is how do you make sure you have the money you need to enjoy all of these years. ♪ >>> boston affiliate talking to fellow student. >> they were originally not born in this country. he told us along with english also spoke arabic and maybe one other language. do you know anything about that? >> no. honestly i don't. i only communicated with him in english. i didn't know he c
soil, the law enforcement is in full force. this is what they've been planning and practicing for the last 12 years, carl? >> it's true. you always hear about drills. you wonder what is that for? only in achgs is like this does all that preparation, all that money spent become apparent. we'll come back to you in a bit, i'm sure. a lot more "squawk on the street" is back in a minute. you've known? hn we gave people a sticker and had them show us. we learned a lot of us have known...
76
76
Mar 30, 2015
03/15
by
CNBC
tv
eye 76
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> tim cook penning an op-ed against indiana's religious freedom law. while the ceo of angie's list explains his halting of expansion in the state. >> ford reviving the iconic lincoln continental, and we will start to ceo mark fields live in just a few moments. stock futures up after a chinese central stock bank owner said he saw more room. about $12.8 billion in cash. and then of course the personal income rose .4% but spending was up a weaker than expected .1. you were talking about these deals with joe back at hq. a bunch of deals this morning. >> i think what's worth watching is how much the acquirer is going to go up. you have a deal like horizon had them on "mad money" because of their tax status. it's a terrific deal. an orphan drug. they tend not to go into orphan drugs, but that's what they're doing. you'll see united health go up because there's a scarcity of pharmacy benefit managers. these are percolating. but it is -- the futures were down rather markedly until china came in. i find all of these chinese stories to be a lot of just all talk,
. >> tim cook penning an op-ed against indiana's religious freedom law. while the ceo of angie's list explains his halting of expansion in the state. >> ford reviving the iconic lincoln continental, and we will start to ceo mark fields live in just a few moments. stock futures up after a chinese central stock bank owner said he saw more room. about $12.8 billion in cash. and then of course the personal income rose .4% but spending was up a weaker than expected .1. you were talking...
224
224
Feb 25, 2016
02/16
by
CNBC
tv
eye 224
favorite 0
quote 0
we will and we'll use whatever lawful tools are available to us. in the larger conversation, our role is to make sure folks understand what are the costs associated with moving to a world of universal strong encryption. there's tons of benefit. i love privacy. when i hear corporations saying we're going to take you to a world where no one can look at your stuff, part of me thinks that's great. i don't want anybody looking at my stuff. i step back, law enforcement, which i'm part of really does save people's lives, rescue kids, rescue neighborhoods from terrorists and we do that a whole lot through court orders that are search warrants and we do it a whole lot through search warrants of mobile devices. if we're going to move to a world where that is not possible anymore, the world will not end but it will be a different world than where we are today and where we were in 2014. we just have to make sure the bure bureau explains to folks what the costs are. this is too important to let us drift and so my goal is to have the bureau be a factual input so
we will and we'll use whatever lawful tools are available to us. in the larger conversation, our role is to make sure folks understand what are the costs associated with moving to a world of universal strong encryption. there's tons of benefit. i love privacy. when i hear corporations saying we're going to take you to a world where no one can look at your stuff, part of me thinks that's great. i don't want anybody looking at my stuff. i step back, law enforcement, which i'm part of really does...
52
52
Oct 8, 2019
10/19
by
CNBC
tv
eye 52
favorite 0
quote 0
all laws apply to everyone with equal force. one day you say i don't care about ukraine but you care if the chief executive starts whennizing the anti-trust laws to pick out favorites to destroy healthy industries because they have crossed them. history is filled with examples of leaders who abandoned the rule of law, got rid of the independent judiciary, suppressed the press and went on to wreak havoc with the economies and in some cases to destroy the economies. >> are there checks on the deep state? we can talk about it on elected officials, but what about the deep state >> there are many checks on the deep state trump has made it into something where these are people trying to guard their own power, expand their own power, at the expense of elected officials that's what the deep state started out doing in places like turkey and egypt that is not what has been happening here both constitutionally and legally, we've signed, defined responsibilities to career bureaucrats who can be of either party, like i said, they pledge alle
all laws apply to everyone with equal force. one day you say i don't care about ukraine but you care if the chief executive starts whennizing the anti-trust laws to pick out favorites to destroy healthy industries because they have crossed them. history is filled with examples of leaders who abandoned the rule of law, got rid of the independent judiciary, suppressed the press and went on to wreak havoc with the economies and in some cases to destroy the economies. >> are there checks on...
0
0.0
Dec 13, 2022
12/22
by
CNBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
regulators and law enforcement. we will turn over any information that will be relevant to them. >> thank you i will point out in particular that one of the counts, count eight, in the complaint or indictment is violation of campaign finance laws. and i hope what you will turn over is a list of the major bonuses and/or loans it is reported that ryan solome got a $55 million loan so that law enforcement can piece together when those loans and bonuses were made and when they immediately preceded disguised campaign contributions can we count on you to do that >> yes, i can confirm that. >> my time is expired. >> thank you the gentleman from oklahoma, mr. lucas, is now recognized for five minutes. >> thank you, madam chairman, and thank you, mr. ray, for appearing before the committee this morning, particularly in light of the recent arrest of bankment freed i expected you would be cautious this morning in your answers and you have been very thorough and methodical and the committee and i appreciate that. first i'd like
regulators and law enforcement. we will turn over any information that will be relevant to them. >> thank you i will point out in particular that one of the counts, count eight, in the complaint or indictment is violation of campaign finance laws. and i hope what you will turn over is a list of the major bonuses and/or loans it is reported that ryan solome got a $55 million loan so that law enforcement can piece together when those loans and bonuses were made and when they immediately...
200
200
Jun 10, 2019
06/19
by
CNBC
tv
eye 200
favorite 0
quote 1
to throw that into the mix, which is really a law enforcement issue, either they broke the law or didn't and they have to be treated like everyone else, throwing that into a trade negotiation, which has already, you know, taken tariffs and weaponized them, used -- we just have seen mexico for purely political reasons and even with china, not just addressing barriers to competition in china, but a host of supposedly exclusionary and policies there that we don't like is really pushing the envelope and i don't know, i'm waiting for a victory here i'm waiting to see one i just don't know if it is working. >> i think his answer on the antitrust question going after our best and brightest which shows a little bit of a conflict going on, right? the fact that the -- his administration, his doj, his ftc is starting to investigate these companies at the same time that he says we're better than everybody else we have the technological prowess, goes after the eu for hating the u.s. every time there is another fine on an american technology company, what are investors supposed to make of the presiden
to throw that into the mix, which is really a law enforcement issue, either they broke the law or didn't and they have to be treated like everyone else, throwing that into a trade negotiation, which has already, you know, taken tariffs and weaponized them, used -- we just have seen mexico for purely political reasons and even with china, not just addressing barriers to competition in china, but a host of supposedly exclusionary and policies there that we don't like is really pushing the...
89
89
Dec 30, 2019
12/19
by
CNBC
tv
eye 89
favorite 0
quote 0
for the new year comes new laws from sports gambling to privacy and pot. implications for the economy and your portfolio - [spokesman] if you've tried college but never finished, (group cheering) snhu lets you transfer up to 90 credits toward you bachelor's degree. - [woman] it doesn't matter how old you are, you can do it, you can finish. - [spokesman] finish your degree at snhu.edu >>> there is the s&p 500 heat map. there's a lot of red on that board this morning two thirds of 1% the s&p declining this morning, a loss of 21.5 points energy is the only s&p sector moving higher so some of the names in the green from the energy space and a lot of red on the board this morning individual donations to charity falling for two years but while chair itible giving is down it is certainly not out let's check in with kayla taysha for more. >> the federal government is suggesting the drop won't be as steep as expected. take a look at the data, the joint committee on taxation expected giving to cause outside education and health to hit $30 billion in 2019 before risi
for the new year comes new laws from sports gambling to privacy and pot. implications for the economy and your portfolio - [spokesman] if you've tried college but never finished, (group cheering) snhu lets you transfer up to 90 credits toward you bachelor's degree. - [woman] it doesn't matter how old you are, you can do it, you can finish. - [spokesman] finish your degree at snhu.edu >>> there is the s&p 500 heat map. there's a lot of red on that board this morning two thirds of 1%...
32
32
Apr 5, 2021
04/21
by
CNBC
tv
eye 32
favorite 0
quote 0
that is nationwide the georgia law, of course, is signed but legislators in 43 states are considering changes that could limit some kind of voting the next big battle ground is texas, where they are considering bills on early voting, drive-in voting, and absentee ballots some big texas companies are speaking out, they include american airline, and dell technologies coming out against specific bills other companies are being more general, like southwest airlines which sent us a statement last night saying we believe every voter should have a fair opportunity to let their voice be heard but declining to talk about specific legislation at&t says it is working with the business round table and other countries on voting rights no response from other big texas companies, most notably exxon mobil but it's not clear how far any of these companies is willing to go. so far the only company or organization that we know of to actually take its business elsewhere is major league baseball everyone else just talking thus far. guys >> scott, yeah, such an interesting issue and the corporate response
that is nationwide the georgia law, of course, is signed but legislators in 43 states are considering changes that could limit some kind of voting the next big battle ground is texas, where they are considering bills on early voting, drive-in voting, and absentee ballots some big texas companies are speaking out, they include american airline, and dell technologies coming out against specific bills other companies are being more general, like southwest airlines which sent us a statement last...
137
137
Jul 7, 2016
07/16
by
CNBC
tv
eye 137
favorite 0
quote 0
did hillary clinton break the law? >> in connection with her use of the e-mail server my judgment is she did not. >> did you just not able to prosecute it or did hillary clinton break the law? >> well, i don't want to give an overly lawyerly answer, the question i look is there evidence that would establish beyond a reasonable doubt that somebody engaged in conduct that violated a criminal statute and my judgment here is there is not. >> the fbi does background checks. if hillary clinton applied for the job at the fbi, would the fbi give hillary clinton a security clearance? >> i don't want to answer a hypothetical. the fbi has a robust process in which we adjudicate the suitability of people for employs in the bureau. >> given the fact pattern that you laid out less than 48 hours ago, would a person who had dealt with classified information like that, would that person be granted a security clearance at the fbi? >> it would be a very important consideration in the suitability consideration. >> you're kind of making my
did hillary clinton break the law? >> in connection with her use of the e-mail server my judgment is she did not. >> did you just not able to prosecute it or did hillary clinton break the law? >> well, i don't want to give an overly lawyerly answer, the question i look is there evidence that would establish beyond a reasonable doubt that somebody engaged in conduct that violated a criminal statute and my judgment here is there is not. >> the fbi does background checks....
0
0.0
Aug 9, 2022
08/22
by
CNBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >>> also, with president biden about to sign the chips act into law. mike announces an investment into u.s. chip manufacturing over the next eight years or so. still waiting on the top stocks, sanjay mehrotra. >>> and warren buffett keeps buying. occidental petroleum. it is now above 20% ownership state in that company. all right. we are going to start with these stocks. they are making a comeback. that is the best way to say it. bed bath and beyond, you may have noticed as of late, up 90% over the last week of trading. and even game stop. i want to put this in the perspective of a market that continues to be difficult, jim, and for many, at least, professionals to figure out what some would say is a very hated rally. by many. i know the hedge funds are getting crushed again. many have been taken their exposure down to very low levels and are short. in fact, may be short some of these very names, yet again. as you know, short covering has been crazy lately in terms of what it has been adding to this market rally. >> yeah. i think it is a great place to
. >>> also, with president biden about to sign the chips act into law. mike announces an investment into u.s. chip manufacturing over the next eight years or so. still waiting on the top stocks, sanjay mehrotra. >>> and warren buffett keeps buying. occidental petroleum. it is now above 20% ownership state in that company. all right. we are going to start with these stocks. they are making a comeback. that is the best way to say it. bed bath and beyond, you may have noticed as...
419
419
Aug 30, 2016
08/16
by
CNBC
tv
eye 419
favorite 0
quote 0
with a law of what the commission thinks the laws should have been. apple goes on to say, it would create up certainty and part of what i asked on the call was what is apple looking for, as far as redress, as far as -- what options does apple have, not just legal, but in the way it's communicating and the executives said pretty clearly we're looking for all of europe to take notice here because this is a sovereignty issue, and it's a certainty issue and going to have a lot to do with how we invest. apple saying they're the largest taxpayer in the u.s. and in the world and given the fact apple is by many measures the biggest company in the world and certainly profits are huge that perhaps isn't a surprise. here's part of what the issue is, as i've looked at it, a lot of people looking at, as julia mentioned, this enormous pile of cash, over $200 billion sitting in overseas accounts. in the u.s., when apple gets asked about paying taxes on that amount, on repatriot and apple says 40% that's a really high amount to bring back, you wouldn't want to be tax
with a law of what the commission thinks the laws should have been. apple goes on to say, it would create up certainty and part of what i asked on the call was what is apple looking for, as far as redress, as far as -- what options does apple have, not just legal, but in the way it's communicating and the executives said pretty clearly we're looking for all of europe to take notice here because this is a sovereignty issue, and it's a certainty issue and going to have a lot to do with how we...
0
0.0
Sep 12, 2022
09/22
by
CNBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but the law is the law, roger. i mean, really you're quite cynical. >> well, i feel it's appropriate. and i think it's appropriate because as an investor, the law really matters we depend on property law in order to be shareholders as a consequence, when people ignore contracts, when people ignore property law, that's a huge threat to investors you know, david, because i've been on this program talking about this before, that i'm really, really worried about all of the trends in the united states when it comes to enforcing property law and contract law because we have been giving a pass to super rich people whenever they violate some contract or some law. we defer to them as though they're royalty. and in my mind, that ultimately leads to a terrible place for investors. >> all the more reason why that trial is going to be very interesting. >> why all of us investors should be -- we should all be hoping that the contract is enforced because i think in the end as investors, we depend on contract law this is going to
but the law is the law, roger. i mean, really you're quite cynical. >> well, i feel it's appropriate. and i think it's appropriate because as an investor, the law really matters we depend on property law in order to be shareholders as a consequence, when people ignore contracts, when people ignore property law, that's a huge threat to investors you know, david, because i've been on this program talking about this before, that i'm really, really worried about all of the trends in the...
107
107
Feb 22, 2016
02/16
by
CNBC
tv
eye 107
favorite 0
quote 0
he's pro law enforcement, anti-terror. >> you know who we can get to add to it? >> who. >> eamon javers. >> how did you know to do that? >> then we can react to it, or maybe not at all. let's get to eamon. he's been following the moment by moment e-mails and letters. he joins us from d.c. >> david, this thing has been hot overnight with the back and forth now in this war of words. last night with the fbi director, this morning tim cook, the ceo of apple sending out a letter to his employees at apple thanks them for their service on behalf of privacy. here's what tim cook said this morning. this case is about much more than a single phone or a single investigation. so when we received the government's order we knew we had to speak out. at stake is the data security of hundreds of millions of law abiding people and setting a dangerous precedent that threatens everyone's civil liberties. also last night we had the fbi director making a post to a legal blog making his case. here's what james comey had to say last night. he said we don't want to break anyone's encrypt
he's pro law enforcement, anti-terror. >> you know who we can get to add to it? >> who. >> eamon javers. >> how did you know to do that? >> then we can react to it, or maybe not at all. let's get to eamon. he's been following the moment by moment e-mails and letters. he joins us from d.c. >> david, this thing has been hot overnight with the back and forth now in this war of words. last night with the fbi director, this morning tim cook, the ceo of apple...
132
132
Feb 23, 2016
02/16
by
CNBC
tv
eye 132
favorite 0
quote 0
we have gone back to two other blue chip law firms. i saw on cnbc earlier this morning, it's apparent it's hard to do the deal. >> what did they say, when you went to the law firms? >> they bottom line said it would be irresponsible for us to pursue the merger because of the destruction in value, the etc. keep in mind we're in the process of reinvigorating utc. we have a brand-new gear turbo fan engine, we're going to be building 1,000 of these engines in a couple years. the thought of trying to distract everybody with a merger doesn't make sense. especially a merger that is unlikely to occur. >> christine varney who ran antitrust with the department of justice, now a lawyer at korvath. she says, in fact, they're advising honeywell that 4% of sales or less would be affected by an overlap and divestiture would have to be between 2 billion and $4 billion. another respected law firm here, someone who ran the antitrust division seems to disagree. >> let me be more specific. if you think about the aero businesses, if you comb combine honeyw
we have gone back to two other blue chip law firms. i saw on cnbc earlier this morning, it's apparent it's hard to do the deal. >> what did they say, when you went to the law firms? >> they bottom line said it would be irresponsible for us to pursue the merger because of the destruction in value, the etc. keep in mind we're in the process of reinvigorating utc. we have a brand-new gear turbo fan engine, we're going to be building 1,000 of these engines in a couple years. the thought...
141
141
Oct 8, 2015
10/15
by
CNBC
tv
eye 141
favorite 0
quote 0
environmental laws, that's not appropriate under west virginia consumer protection laws. if you make a promise to a consumer in the state of west virginia or nationally, you need to honor t it is apparent from all the information we have through the west virginia university study and all of the other material that's coming forward that they violated west virginia laws. >> i see effectively, you are asking for $12,000 per customer. the extra that they had to pay to get a clean, diesel car plus $5,000 in civil penalties, given that we understand that the head of volkswagen usa is about to say he accepts the consequences of their acts providing a remedy and beginning to restore trust around the world, is this an open and shut case for you? how long will it take to get a resolution here? >> it is always hard to predict how long litigation like this will take. obviously, we are seeking to ensure that consumers are held harmless for the damages that occurred to them. what we are asking for is to ensure that consumers who had no idea that this was happening, that we could make u
environmental laws, that's not appropriate under west virginia consumer protection laws. if you make a promise to a consumer in the state of west virginia or nationally, you need to honor t it is apparent from all the information we have through the west virginia university study and all of the other material that's coming forward that they violated west virginia laws. >> i see effectively, you are asking for $12,000 per customer. the extra that they had to pay to get a clean, diesel car...
58
58
Jan 8, 2020
01/20
by
CNBC
tv
eye 58
favorite 0
quote 0
nobody cares they broke the law you know very well that there is a law in japan saying the prosecutor cannot leak you know that. okay you know that. but you know they leak everybody tells you they leak. all the journalists tell me we heard this from the prosecutor okay, they're breaking law and nobody cares so why me, breaking the law, is a problem, when the prosecutor breaking ten laws is not a problem and nobody cares so at a certain point in time, when you are in a situation where the only guy you have to respect the law and everybody else doesn't respect the law and nobody cares, you say it's a rigged system. it's a rigged system and frankly, i don't think japan deserves that. i don't think japanese people are like that. as i told you, i like japan. i like japanese people i spent 17 years i don't regret it. i don't regret it. what i regret is specific domination i've done inside the company, because at the end of the day, i was wrong on the people i read that, but the japanese people have been good to me and my intention is not to hurt japan or hurt the japanese people but why am
nobody cares they broke the law you know very well that there is a law in japan saying the prosecutor cannot leak you know that. okay you know that. but you know they leak everybody tells you they leak. all the journalists tell me we heard this from the prosecutor okay, they're breaking law and nobody cares so why me, breaking the law, is a problem, when the prosecutor breaking ten laws is not a problem and nobody cares so at a certain point in time, when you are in a situation where the only...
81
81
Sep 5, 2018
09/18
by
CNBC
tv
eye 81
favorite 0
quote 0
and that is why we're continually working with law enforcement. chairman burr, i want to thank you for your leadership. vice chairman warner, i want to thank you for your white paper, which has so many ideas on how we can work together to strengthen our defense senators, let me be clear. we are more determined than our opponents and we will keep fighting when bad actors try to use our site we will block them. when content violates our policies, we will take it down and when our opponents use new techniques, we will share them so we can strengthen our collective efforts everyone here today knows that this is an arms race and that means we need to be ever more vigilant as chairman burr has noted, nothing less than the integrity of our democratic institutions, processes and ideals is at stake. we agree, and we will work with all of you to meet this challenge. thank you. >> mr. dorsey, the floor is yours. >> thank you, chairman burr. vice chairman warner, and the committee for the opportunity to speak on behalf of twitter, to the american people. i lo
and that is why we're continually working with law enforcement. chairman burr, i want to thank you for your leadership. vice chairman warner, i want to thank you for your white paper, which has so many ideas on how we can work together to strengthen our defense senators, let me be clear. we are more determined than our opponents and we will keep fighting when bad actors try to use our site we will block them. when content violates our policies, we will take it down and when our opponents use...
95
95
Oct 5, 2015
10/15
by
CNBC
tv
eye 95
favorite 0
quote 0
this has always been the law. this has always been the law for 30 years. this has just been clarified now. it doesn't give anybody an edge today that they didn't have years ago. >> the assumption before was on the basis of friendship i could pass a tip on because it was my friend that i was telling. that would be considered the benefit that would have led to a prosecution. that's been clarified, to frighten it back, to having to show some material benefit. >> yes. except friendship still counts. if you and i are the best friends, we're out golfing, and i pass you a tip that says coke will buy pepsi. >> right. >> you trade on it, you're still liable for insider trading, even if you don't give me anything in return. it's where there isn't a real friendship, where people have work friendships, sort of cordial, but there's a work aspect to their relationship and a real aspect to it. so an investor relations person who has become friendly with an analyst at a hedge fund, that person -- now the government has to show specific real friendship, a real relationship
this has always been the law. this has always been the law for 30 years. this has just been clarified now. it doesn't give anybody an edge today that they didn't have years ago. >> the assumption before was on the basis of friendship i could pass a tip on because it was my friend that i was telling. that would be considered the benefit that would have led to a prosecution. that's been clarified, to frighten it back, to having to show some material benefit. >> yes. except friendship...
21
21
Sep 1, 2021
09/21
by
CNBC
tv
eye 21
favorite 0
quote 0
now, this data security law is just one of three frameworks to help govern the digital economy. the cyber security law came into effect in 2017 that requires companies to improve the security of their data networks. and the next one is the personal information protection law that has been going to go into effect november 1st and specifically focuses on protecting the personal n information of the people here guys >> eunice, thank you >>> chinese tech names still making gains this morning. significant ones, despite what, as eunice elicited, is regulatory actions in the sector and joining us is key analyst at key bank capital i see in the notes that you, at least say that nothing that has transpired has blindsided us much, given it's been openly discussed over the last few years. if that's the case, why have the stocks reacted the way they have, at least previously, if we can expect what's been unfolding? >> i think a lot of public market investors are sitting in new york and london and don't pay enough attention to what's going on in the ground in china. don't listen on the rheto
now, this data security law is just one of three frameworks to help govern the digital economy. the cyber security law came into effect in 2017 that requires companies to improve the security of their data networks. and the next one is the personal information protection law that has been going to go into effect november 1st and specifically focuses on protecting the personal n information of the people here guys >> eunice, thank you >>> chinese tech names still making gains this...
0
0.0
Jun 6, 2023
06/23
by
CNBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
securities laws. we're asking them to come into compliance they're going a bit of "catch us if you can." they're commingling various functions. the public would be aghast if they thought the new york stock exchange was also running a hedge fund trading against them or allowing watched trading or lacked controlled to protect against fraud and manipulation on the platform. so the conversations have been constructive, but it's also about them bringing a business model into compliance. we have had success. even in the last two weeks an entity filed -- a crypto entity filed as what's called a special purpose broker dealer and got registered that way. we've had success with tokens. now it's about these crypto exchanges in the middle of the market where frankly the public should really be careful >> chair gensler, if it's a business model built on non-compliance as you just said, if they do comply, do they no longer have a business >> look, i think if there's a real value in these crypto tokens, then complia
securities laws. we're asking them to come into compliance they're going a bit of "catch us if you can." they're commingling various functions. the public would be aghast if they thought the new york stock exchange was also running a hedge fund trading against them or allowing watched trading or lacked controlled to protect against fraud and manipulation on the platform. so the conversations have been constructive, but it's also about them bringing a business model into compliance. we...
178
178
Jun 4, 2019
06/19
by
CNBC
tv
eye 178
favorite 0
quote 0
don't want to pass laws that could be passed in 15 minutes or passed quickly. in one day it could changed. beyond the laws, mexico should not allow millions of people to travel into our country and they can stop it quicklimey. i think they'll will if they won't, we'll put tariffs on every month it will go from 5% to 10%, 15% and 20%. what will happen is all of those companies have left our country and gone to mexico are going to come back to us. that's okay. i think mexico will step up and do what they should have been done i don't want to hear that mexico is run by the cartels and drug lords oroz coyotes a lot of people are saying that. i don't want to hear they are run by the cartels you understand, you report on it a lot of times a lot of people do that'll be a terrible thing. mexico should step up and stop this onslaught of this investigatiinvasion into our country >> prime minister may, you tried three times to get a deal on brexit at this point, do you believe a deal on brexit is possible or s or -- president trump says you did not take his advice in term
don't want to pass laws that could be passed in 15 minutes or passed quickly. in one day it could changed. beyond the laws, mexico should not allow millions of people to travel into our country and they can stop it quicklimey. i think they'll will if they won't, we'll put tariffs on every month it will go from 5% to 10%, 15% and 20%. what will happen is all of those companies have left our country and gone to mexico are going to come back to us. that's okay. i think mexico will step up and do...
118
118
Dec 29, 2017
12/17
by
CNBC
tv
eye 118
favorite 0
quote 0
as well netflix is giving top executives raises for 2018, citing the new tax law as the reason the law does eliminate certain surcharges on executive salaries, among those getting raises, reed hastings and david wells and three other executives i think it's bonuses that are in question here in terms of their tax deductibility. you may want to increase therefore on the salary front. let's start with goldman though, guys what i'm hearing is they simply want to start next year as a clean year we know repatriation tax, 8% on nan cash, 15.5% on cash. you can take it over eight years, i believe but in this case, goldman, which does derive as much as 40% of earnings from european and asian operations and has been generating a good amount of cash overseas taking it all now that's two-thirds of this $5 billion. >> it's more than going to wipe out the fourth quarter profit. it was only going to be $2 billion according to the street. this is a minus three now. they are going to kitchen sink it. >> the market will not react one would expect because the cash is free to come back without any further
as well netflix is giving top executives raises for 2018, citing the new tax law as the reason the law does eliminate certain surcharges on executive salaries, among those getting raises, reed hastings and david wells and three other executives i think it's bonuses that are in question here in terms of their tax deductibility. you may want to increase therefore on the salary front. let's start with goldman though, guys what i'm hearing is they simply want to start next year as a clean year we...
102
102
Apr 10, 2018
04/18
by
CNBC
tv
eye 102
favorite 0
quote 0
privacy laws because the u.s. right now has really lagged when it has come to improving our privacy protection for users. i agree you don't want to lock in a current business model. if you establish technology neutral safe guards for personal data and have them apply to everyone then i think you have a good starting point for an effective privacy law. >> where i also agree with mark, by the way, is that where the opportunity is there are a lot of people involved in the data space. for example all data minorsers don't tell you what they are doing and you have no idea what they are gathering. all the app developers to give a signal how they are using data they get from people. i hope we can get to that discussion. >> i was going to ask if europe's new privacy rule is a model for the u.s. one that goldman sachs analysts say will effect seven percent of facebook's revenues. >> i think the europeans are definitely on the right track. they have except a lot of time developing the privacy law. it is going into force in m
privacy laws because the u.s. right now has really lagged when it has come to improving our privacy protection for users. i agree you don't want to lock in a current business model. if you establish technology neutral safe guards for personal data and have them apply to everyone then i think you have a good starting point for an effective privacy law. >> where i also agree with mark, by the way, is that where the opportunity is there are a lot of people involved in the data space. for...
527
527
Apr 2, 2015
04/15
by
CNBC
tv
eye 527
favorite 0
quote 0
you know any ceos that said this is a great law. >> no i don't. stepping out to defend it is probably -- >> why? why? people have conviction. >> i know. typically you don't see corporations take one side or another. they're in the business of trying to get as many people as possible to use whatever product it is they're selling. so antagonizing anybody is not something you see. >> clearly antagonizing. walmart is antagonizing people who might want to say i want to go to some place that doesn't look -- >> that's why it's a news story. >> exactly where i'm going. people say, cramer's, butt your head out of religious freedom. i'm like you know religious freedom, marriott's not -- they're focused on the notion of discrimination, it's not the government that is discriminating which was the clinton law that he signed. it's corporations. they don't want to be lumped in with corporations that they perceive, they perceive to be discriminatory. >> went you're walmart, 2 million employees that figures prominently into decisions as well. a broad group of peop
you know any ceos that said this is a great law. >> no i don't. stepping out to defend it is probably -- >> why? why? people have conviction. >> i know. typically you don't see corporations take one side or another. they're in the business of trying to get as many people as possible to use whatever product it is they're selling. so antagonizing anybody is not something you see. >> clearly antagonizing. walmart is antagonizing people who might want to say i want to go to...
145
145
Apr 1, 2016
04/16
by
CNBC
tv
eye 145
favorite 0
quote 0
no question this is an unconstitutional law. it will get struck down in federal courts, certainly since the defense of marriage act was struck down in the federal court. you can't pick out one my moino group and say you can't have law prospecting you. i have no doubt this will fail on legal challenges. what businesses recognize is we don't have to sit here and wait for the courts. there are other ways of bringing about change. companies are becoming more comfortable. it's not just starbucks which led this or apple or west coast people, we're now talking about the heartland of the south here. >> jim, thank you. >> all right. >> jim stewart from the new york times. >>> quick market check, we are near session highs. quite a recovery for the u.s. stock market. at one point the dow was down 117. the turning point came at 10:00 a.m. after the ism manufacturing index came out above 50, above 51 signaling an expansion, a better number than expected. the dow goes positive. it is now up about 35 points. some of the groups in the lead, con
no question this is an unconstitutional law. it will get struck down in federal courts, certainly since the defense of marriage act was struck down in the federal court. you can't pick out one my moino group and say you can't have law prospecting you. i have no doubt this will fail on legal challenges. what businesses recognize is we don't have to sit here and wait for the courts. there are other ways of bringing about change. companies are becoming more comfortable. it's not just starbucks...
143
143
Dec 21, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 143
favorite 0
quote 0
, lawful people will protect us where 20,000 other laws have failed. as brave and heroic and as self-sacrificing as those teachers were in those classrooms, and as prompt and professional and well trained as those police were when they responded, they were unable through no fault of their own unable to stop it. as parents, we do everything we can to keep our children safe. it's now time for us to assume responsibility for our schools. the only way -- the only way to stop a monster from killing our kids is to be personally involved and invested in a plan of absolute protection. the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. would you rather have your 911 call bring a good guy with a gun from a mile away or from a minute away? now, i can imagine the headlines, the shocking headlines you'll print tomorrow. more guns, you'll claim, are the nra's answer to everything. your implication will be that guns are evil and have no place in society, much less in our schools. but since when did the gun automatically become a bad word? a gun
, lawful people will protect us where 20,000 other laws have failed. as brave and heroic and as self-sacrificing as those teachers were in those classrooms, and as prompt and professional and well trained as those police were when they responded, they were unable through no fault of their own unable to stop it. as parents, we do everything we can to keep our children safe. it's now time for us to assume responsibility for our schools. the only way -- the only way to stop a monster from killing...
136
136
May 2, 2014
05/14
by
CNBC
tv
eye 136
favorite 0
quote 0
no license plate. >> there's pattern there of sort of thinking i'm above the law, law doesn't apply to me and part of the brilliance and remains a -- on the letter of the law, he was certainly skating awfully close to the edge. there's a recklessness there. you have to wonder when would he have finally gone over the line? >> getting into his head, you delve into the aspect of so obsessed with competition, right? references to nuclear war coming to google and might have enjoyed some of this skating the line a little bit. >> probably. i think there is probably some thrill about that. and it is kind of a paradox that he's so lauded competition and reveled in it but many monopolists, price fixers, similar attitudes and it's their zeal to get the other guys that pushes them a couple of steps too far. >> and pushed off the road early on by powerful interests in silicone valley and beyond and skated close and maybe the experience taught him how to skate. >> apple will say on ebooks, we brought more competition to that space than was there previously. >> that's what they're saying. that's n
no license plate. >> there's pattern there of sort of thinking i'm above the law, law doesn't apply to me and part of the brilliance and remains a -- on the letter of the law, he was certainly skating awfully close to the edge. there's a recklessness there. you have to wonder when would he have finally gone over the line? >> getting into his head, you delve into the aspect of so obsessed with competition, right? references to nuclear war coming to google and might have enjoyed some...
24
24
Jan 6, 2022
01/22
by
CNBC
tv
eye 24
favorite 0
quote 0
law. our democracy held we the people endured. we the people prevailed. for the first time in our history, the president had not just lost an election. he tried to prevent the peaceful transfer of power as a violent mob reached the capitol, but they failed. they failed. on this day of remembrance, we must make sure such an attack never, never happens again i'm speaking to you today from statutary hall this is where the house of representatives met for 50 years in the decades leading up to the civil war. it's on this floor where a young congressman from illinois, a lincoln sat. there's a sculpture depicting cleo, the muse of history. in her hands, an open book in which she records the events taking place in this chamber below. she stood watch over this hall one year ago today, as she has for more than 200 years. she recorded what took place, the real history, the real facts, the real truth. the facts and the truth that vice president harris just shared, and that you and i and the whole worl
law. our democracy held we the people endured. we the people prevailed. for the first time in our history, the president had not just lost an election. he tried to prevent the peaceful transfer of power as a violent mob reached the capitol, but they failed. they failed. on this day of remembrance, we must make sure such an attack never, never happens again i'm speaking to you today from statutary hall this is where the house of representatives met for 50 years in the decades leading up to the...
0
0.0
Jun 21, 2023
06/23
by
CNBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the existing threshold before the law was modified was $20,000. that is how far this administration wants to peek behind the curtain of what my constituents are going spending their money on i want to know specifically, for my constituents back home, the thoughts of creating a central bank digital currency that tracks individuals, if the fed were to offer a direct individual accounts to citizens, wouldn't this be a direct threat to the financial privacy of many americans? >> potentially, and that's why that's not something we support. we would not support accounts at the federal reserve by individuals. if we were to and we're a long way from this, if we were to support one, it would be one that was intermediated between the banking system and no not by the fed. >> i'm happy to hear that. with that, i yield my time and rends the gentlewoman from colorado, miss peterson for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman and thank you, chair powell, for being with us again today. >> i come from colorado. i was in the legislature for ten years, and when the
the existing threshold before the law was modified was $20,000. that is how far this administration wants to peek behind the curtain of what my constituents are going spending their money on i want to know specifically, for my constituents back home, the thoughts of creating a central bank digital currency that tracks individuals, if the fed were to offer a direct individual accounts to citizens, wouldn't this be a direct threat to the financial privacy of many americans? >> potentially,...
185
185
Apr 7, 2016
04/16
by
CNBC
tv
eye 185
favorite 0
quote 0
>> although changing laws is what read would say. >> although those aren't laws. that's the problem. they're just administrative actions. >> i thought there was a moment in jamie dimon's letter that was eye-opening. he said that brazil's a rule-of-law country, which made me think, kind of interesting. i didn't think brazil's a rule-of-law country. very optimistic on brazil and argentina. >> yeah. they've got an ad hoc committee working -- >> just in terms of, like jamie, i'm sure he's watching. hey, jamie. so, i'm bringing up the positive mention of brazil. >> you're a bright, shining light every morning. >> yeah, i am. you know what? >> of hope. a beacon. >> i'm a hole in one. >> yes. >> which no longer means that much. >> apparently not, not in augusta. when we come back, jeff immelt taking on bernie sanders in this op ed in the "washington post," saying ge's destroying the moral fabric of america. senator sanders is about to speak in philly. we're going to monitor that and see if he has any response to mr. immelt. >>> meanwhile, take a look at futures, weak to
>> although changing laws is what read would say. >> although those aren't laws. that's the problem. they're just administrative actions. >> i thought there was a moment in jamie dimon's letter that was eye-opening. he said that brazil's a rule-of-law country, which made me think, kind of interesting. i didn't think brazil's a rule-of-law country. very optimistic on brazil and argentina. >> yeah. they've got an ad hoc committee working -- >> just in terms of, like...
87
87
Sep 6, 2019
09/19
by
CNBC
tv
eye 87
favorite 0
quote 0
the largest media platform in the world must follow the law. joining us the former head of the new york ag bureau he is now down in moffett kerman he has been recently obtained tovito advise google. premise in usa versus microsoft the company had a dominant position in a important product market that they leveraged to force consumers to buy bundled products that they didn't want or need. does that apply to either google or facebook? >> i don't think so. these are very different issues. each company faces different issues so no similarity, i don't think. they all have large market shares. >> right what's the distinction between google's overwhelming market share in search that is different from what microsoft had in operating systems >> so microsoft had a very large 90% plus market share, which is much larger, i believe, than google has in search had it for over a decade so the numbers at the time were much different and what microsoft basically did, you had a very good summary, they used their market power to insulate themselves from the compet
the largest media platform in the world must follow the law. joining us the former head of the new york ag bureau he is now down in moffett kerman he has been recently obtained tovito advise google. premise in usa versus microsoft the company had a dominant position in a important product market that they leveraged to force consumers to buy bundled products that they didn't want or need. does that apply to either google or facebook? >> i don't think so. these are very different issues....
40
40
Jun 8, 2021
06/21
by
CNBC
tv
eye 40
favorite 0
quote 0
they following the tax law? they are not avoiding. >> we made that point at the end. there is nothing illegal they aren't avoiding it all. a it is the way the law is written. it goes back to who knew iez mer versus mccumber in the early 19 hundreds. myrtle mccumber received a dividend in shares she didn't get cash. why do i have to pay taxes and the supreme court agreed there you have it. you only pay when you realize a gain. >> -- problem is who becomes the referee for fair and after 40-something years in congress, i would think the president understands exactly what is going on with tax laws anyway, thank you, david back to jim, david and carl. didn't mean to leave you guys out. >> all right rick. thank you very much. rick santelli. relatively flattish action as we await the big number of the week cpi coming thursday. in the meantime oil is back below 69 "squawk on the street" continues in a minute. this is how you become the best! [wrestling bell rings] [music: “you're the best” by joe esposito] ♪ try t
they following the tax law? they are not avoiding. >> we made that point at the end. there is nothing illegal they aren't avoiding it all. a it is the way the law is written. it goes back to who knew iez mer versus mccumber in the early 19 hundreds. myrtle mccumber received a dividend in shares she didn't get cash. why do i have to pay taxes and the supreme court agreed there you have it. you only pay when you realize a gain. >> -- problem is who becomes the referee for fair and...
244
244
Oct 25, 2016
10/16
by
CNBC
tv
eye 244
favorite 0
quote 3
-- this is back in law school. when gulf got a bid from chevron, it seemed the most anticompetitive possible deal. seven sisters taking out the six sisters, you get the analogy. he said that deal will sail through but the reagan antitrust department favors combinations. when trump came out and said this deal will not be done. do you think the antitrust department under hillary clinton will be more for giving than under obama? the republicans used to be big champions. reagan would be like he'd stamp it. >> it's interesting because given the year we've had in terms of antitrust really coming to the fore as a break on m & a activity, we have one of the most historic deals just announced saturday night and other huge deals that are being worked on potentially, at least big ones that we may know, but it doesn't seem to have stopped the deal-making. >> at the same time, who's the winner in humana, aetna, cigna. anthem? who's the winner in -- >> if apple were to come over the top and buy time warner, which i'm not saying
-- this is back in law school. when gulf got a bid from chevron, it seemed the most anticompetitive possible deal. seven sisters taking out the six sisters, you get the analogy. he said that deal will sail through but the reagan antitrust department favors combinations. when trump came out and said this deal will not be done. do you think the antitrust department under hillary clinton will be more for giving than under obama? the republicans used to be big champions. reagan would be like he'd...
111
111
Feb 19, 2016
02/16
by
CNBC
tv
eye 111
favorite 0
quote 0
if you feel like this, get a law. pass a law. patriot act. they did that like that, huh? congress. they pass laws. >> they do. >> they do? >> sometimes. >> just want to double check on that. >> sometimes the president signs them. that happens, i'm told. >> i remember that -- >> i have a vague recollection of that. >> i went to congress. >> a bill on capitol hill, but one day maybe not. maybe still i could become a law. >> that's called a government. >>> when we come back, the latest on yahoo!'s formation of an independent panel to explore strategic alternatives. >>> later on, set top box competition. we'll talk with commissioner ajit pai who cast up with of the dissenting votes. the premarket, again, for the dow, s&p and nasdaq, best week since december 20th. you can fly across welcome town in minutes16, or across the globe in under an hour. whole communities are living on mars and solar satellites provide earth with unlimited clean power. in less than a century, boeing took the world from seaplanes to space planes, across the universe and beyond. and if you thought that was amazin
if you feel like this, get a law. pass a law. patriot act. they did that like that, huh? congress. they pass laws. >> they do. >> they do? >> sometimes. >> just want to double check on that. >> sometimes the president signs them. that happens, i'm told. >> i remember that -- >> i have a vague recollection of that. >> i went to congress. >> a bill on capitol hill, but one day maybe not. maybe still i could become a law. >> that's called...
121
121
Oct 21, 2013
10/13
by
CNBC
tv
eye 121
favorite 0
quote 0
that's part of the law. it's already in place. it's happening right now. already because of the affordable care act preventative care like mammograms and birth control are free through your employers. that's part of the law. so there are wide range of consumer protections and benefits that you already have if you've got health insurance, you may not have noticed them, but you've got them. and they're not going anywhere. and they're not dependent on a website. here's another thing that the affordable care act does. in states where governors and legislatures have wisely allowed it, the affordable care act provides opportunity for many americans to get covered under medicaid for the first time. so in oregon, for example, that's helped cut the number of uninsured people by 10% just in the last three weeks. think about that. that's 56,000 more americans who now have health care. that doesn't depend on a website. now, if you're one of the 15% of americans who don't have health insurance, either because you can't a
that's part of the law. it's already in place. it's happening right now. already because of the affordable care act preventative care like mammograms and birth control are free through your employers. that's part of the law. so there are wide range of consumer protections and benefits that you already have if you've got health insurance, you may not have noticed them, but you've got them. and they're not going anywhere. and they're not dependent on a website. here's another thing that the...
170
170
Feb 28, 2014
02/14
by
CNBC
tv
eye 170
favorite 0
quote 0
, because the franchise laws of our state protect consumers statewide. we are the widest most prevalent major retailer in our state, because we have franchise laws that keep dealers from being terminated by the manufacturer and provide the next generation of dealer families to take over the dealership. we have more dealerships in texas over 75 years old than there are manufacturers over 75 years old. so dealers are eternal in our state, and they are not threatening to leave the state. dealers provide a much greater economic impact for texas than tesla would ever provide. >> and i wonder, bill, obviously, and this is going to come down to the regulators and if they have to make the decision if it came down to it, elon musk and the factory and the 6500 jobs or the dealers, are you confident that they would side with you? >> would you say, 6,500 jobs? and they say up to 6,500 jobs and when you say $5 billion and they say up to $5 billion and between now and 2020 when they say that the plant is in full operation, the dealers of texas will have contributed $3
, because the franchise laws of our state protect consumers statewide. we are the widest most prevalent major retailer in our state, because we have franchise laws that keep dealers from being terminated by the manufacturer and provide the next generation of dealer families to take over the dealership. we have more dealerships in texas over 75 years old than there are manufacturers over 75 years old. so dealers are eternal in our state, and they are not threatening to leave the state. dealers...
74
74
Dec 3, 2013
12/13
by
CNBC
tv
eye 74
favorite 0
quote 0
the judge said nothing in federal law distinguishes pension debt from other debt. the unions have challenged the bankruptcy under a number of different grounds, one of them that there's a provision in the michigan constitution that prevents impairment of pension obligations, but the judge says that there's no difference under federal bankruptcy law between pension debt and any other debt. he also has said that chapter 9 of the bankruptcy code, which the unions had challenged outright is constitution an under the federal constitution. the one issue that seems to be remaining, did the city and the state-appointed emergency manager negotiate in good faith with the unions before the july 18th bankruptcy filing. he has yet to rule on that. that, though, could be the final nail in the coffin for the unions, who are trying to prevent this. but regardless, judge rhodes has pretty much acknowledged that whatever he rules is bound to be appealed. >> with the pension of the 23,000 retirees at stake. >> while analysts try to predict whether the years will be hot or cold for in
the judge said nothing in federal law distinguishes pension debt from other debt. the unions have challenged the bankruptcy under a number of different grounds, one of them that there's a provision in the michigan constitution that prevents impairment of pension obligations, but the judge says that there's no difference under federal bankruptcy law between pension debt and any other debt. he also has said that chapter 9 of the bankruptcy code, which the unions had challenged outright is...
130
130
Jan 4, 2017
01/17
by
CNBC
tv
eye 130
favorite 0
quote 0
this law has failed. it's getting worse. families are hurting. no one has choices. we've got to fix this by replacing it with something better. in that transition we want to make sure we don't pull the rug out from anybody during that transition. that's the point we're all trying to make. >> but why still no plan to replace it? >> we have a plan to replace it. we have plenty of ideas to replace it. you'll see as the weeks and months unfold what we're talking about replacing it, how we can get better choices with lower prices by not having a cost of government take over health care which is causing all this problem in the first place. sherman. [ inaudible question ] >> we're talking about a transition that's going to happen quickly, it's going to take action, is it possible to extend some of these provisions when the president-elect and you have all said popular for a temporary period of time i think people want to know what this is going to look like. [ inaudible ] >> well, jake, i think it's -- i want to be very clear. i would commend you and anyone looking onto lo
this law has failed. it's getting worse. families are hurting. no one has choices. we've got to fix this by replacing it with something better. in that transition we want to make sure we don't pull the rug out from anybody during that transition. that's the point we're all trying to make. >> but why still no plan to replace it? >> we have a plan to replace it. we have plenty of ideas to replace it. you'll see as the weeks and months unfold what we're talking about replacing it, how...
187
187
Jun 28, 2012
06/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 187
favorite 0
quote 0
as was the rest of the law. as was the rest of the law, which is majority supported by most -- >> so you're looking glass half full, and i'm looking glass half empty. >> i think it's unfair to say that american was looking in total. there were elements that a lot of people supported. >> the question was were they willing to tolerate a very unpopular part of it which today was upheld? >> but republicans still have to come to the table and express what that solution is. that may not be popular either. >>> the u.s. supreme court has upheld the health care mandate. upheld as a power of congress to tax those who do not get insurance. justice roberts joins the left of the court. justice kennedy joins the dissenters. a big victory for the president as well, who gets to keep the law, his signature policy achievement. risks now being labeled as a tax and spender as taxes may become the focal point of the debate. we'll talk more about that in a minute. >> we want to bring if jim cramer, who joins us again on the phone. ji
as was the rest of the law. as was the rest of the law, which is majority supported by most -- >> so you're looking glass half full, and i'm looking glass half empty. >> i think it's unfair to say that american was looking in total. there were elements that a lot of people supported. >> the question was were they willing to tolerate a very unpopular part of it which today was upheld? >> but republicans still have to come to the table and express what that solution is....
70
70
Nov 13, 2018
11/18
by
CNBC
tv
eye 70
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> well, yes, except for simple violations of anti-trust law require evidence and the economics. so, we're reviewing the evidence in this case and if that's what the economics and the evidence shows, that it would substantially lessen competition, we would block it if it doesn't, i don't think we have a magical number for any particular industry, which is what i've said in the past. >> does leaving a feebled competitor -- in other words sprint wouldn't be able to compete if it was truly left independent? >> that is one of the considerations that goes into a number of factors we would review to see, you know, what would happen to the competitive landscape. does that -- what you're insinuating, does that mean there will only be then two competitors if this merger doesn't happen and one of them would fail or both of them might fail without this merger those would be factors we would consider i don't know if the evidence fully supports that. >> and, finally, your future some say, well, there's an opening now for attorney general of the united states would you be interested? >> i have
. >> well, yes, except for simple violations of anti-trust law require evidence and the economics. so, we're reviewing the evidence in this case and if that's what the economics and the evidence shows, that it would substantially lessen competition, we would block it if it doesn't, i don't think we have a magical number for any particular industry, which is what i've said in the past. >> does leaving a feebled competitor -- in other words sprint wouldn't be able to compete if it was...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2023
04/23
by
CNBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so, the one law, the obvious law, the budget, which is usually more than one law, specifies amounts of spending and taxation and implies a certain deficit for this year as it does for any year that's one law, which congress has already passed, obligating the federal government to meet certain -- a whole list of obligations. the other is the national debt ceiling, which as you know, has already been breached and treasury secretary yellen has been applying ceiling wax and band-aids to try to put off the day of reckoning eventually she's going to run out of tricks up her sleeve and the day of wreckening will be here hopefully congress will have fixed it by then i hope so. it's not something i would normally advocate that the president violate a law. when there are two lays, one says yes, one says no, you don't have much choice >> do you think broadening the scope like this, you may be well within the guard lines of the constitution, is dangerous because it is just sort of -- its fulmination, it will anger the other side more? >> could be. i think there's one sentence in the piece that say
so, the one law, the obvious law, the budget, which is usually more than one law, specifies amounts of spending and taxation and implies a certain deficit for this year as it does for any year that's one law, which congress has already passed, obligating the federal government to meet certain -- a whole list of obligations. the other is the national debt ceiling, which as you know, has already been breached and treasury secretary yellen has been applying ceiling wax and band-aids to try to put...
0
0.0
Mar 23, 2023
03/23
by
CNBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
law? >> like many american companies we lie on the global workforce including engineersq in t(china >> yes or no. >> yes, but we are buildingr texas ande1 committingw3 to firl all protected data. >> i'm taking that asi] a yes because again yourqÑi article 7 the 2017 national intelligence li.m which i just r inok addition, askedfá earlier, 2014 counter espionage law states that when theok state security investigatesq-and understandq a situation of i] espionage, and collectlpe1 releá evidence,xdlpfá the relevant organization and individual, does not say may,fáb.■ it saysÑ provide it truthfully and may yes or no? do any bytedanceçó employees in china including engineers have data? u. stored byu■ default in the orac cloud structu >> the question is do any 1váed including engineers, currently have1jttáj toq u.s. data? >> congressman, i would appreciate this is a complex topic. today all data -- >> yes or no. it's not thatxd complex. >> yes or no do they havet( accs to user data?ta
law? >> like many american companies we lie on the global workforce including engineersq in t(china >> yes or no. >> yes, but we are buildingr texas ande1 committingw3 to firl all protected data. >> i'm taking that asi] a yes because again yourqÑi article 7 the 2017 national intelligence li.m which i just r inok addition, askedfá earlier, 2014 counter espionage law states that when theok state security investigatesq-and understandq a situation of i] espionage, and...
147
147
Jul 8, 2013
07/13
by
CNBC
tv
eye 147
favorite 0
quote 0
and that's the law that governs today. that law requires fhfa to be the conservator of fannie and freddie, not authorize fhfa or treasury to initiate the wind down of the gses. >> do you expect you're going to get your day in court, given that there do appear any number of things that will happen in the not too distant future to begin the wind down that you discuss? >> bewe believe we'll get our day in court. i can't speculate on the legislative processes. but whatever happens with respect to ledgislation in the future, treasury has to follow the law as it exists today. >> you know it's really nice for deficit reduction, all of that money coming in, matthew. >> undoubtedly, this is a good deal for the government. this is undoubtedly part of the reason why the president's fy-'14 budge the projects $248 billion running into treasury's coffers over the next ten years. bottom line the law requires fhfa to operate fannie and freddie, restore them to sound and solvent condition, not leech all of the profits out of the entities.
and that's the law that governs today. that law requires fhfa to be the conservator of fannie and freddie, not authorize fhfa or treasury to initiate the wind down of the gses. >> do you expect you're going to get your day in court, given that there do appear any number of things that will happen in the not too distant future to begin the wind down that you discuss? >> bewe believe we'll get our day in court. i can't speculate on the legislative processes. but whatever happens with...
28
28
Jan 7, 2021
01/21
by
CNBC
tv
eye 28
favorite 0
quote 0
vile lags violation of law is there. by then, i assume the 13 days will have expired. the inauguration will have taken place. you have to go back to trump's initial election, the democrats were casting doubt of the legality, now became far more exacerbating with him claiming that the election was stolen this is not a temporary thing. we have to get this water to stop boiling everybody should be prosecuted who violated any of the laws of trespassing. i think that will be done in an orderly fashion. what i was concerned about with the 25th amendment is that it begins to look preempted instead of waiting those 13 days and he's gone. i think the market so far is looking at the bright side of it everybody will be more cooperative in washington. it will prevent wildly radical programs more middle of the road as everybody tries to look like they are cooperative americans with one another. >> even as you say it, the acting homeland america chief is calling on americans to strongly condemn the violence that happened on wednesday. thank you so much. art cashin of ubs. >> still t
vile lags violation of law is there. by then, i assume the 13 days will have expired. the inauguration will have taken place. you have to go back to trump's initial election, the democrats were casting doubt of the legality, now became far more exacerbating with him claiming that the election was stolen this is not a temporary thing. we have to get this water to stop boiling everybody should be prosecuted who violated any of the laws of trespassing. i think that will be done in an orderly...
0
0.0
Mar 6, 2023
03/23
by
CNBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
shouldn't everything, when it comes to this law, be with the goal of making it more cost affordable and getting rid of the regulatory burdens and not increasing that? >> yes, absolutely but there's a lot of evidence that using a project labor agreement on such huge facilities, like these will be, actually results in lower costs and faster completion. again, we're not requiring union, we're not requiring a project labor agreement. we are preferencing it because we know from history and from fact that when you have a project labor agreement, chances are, it will be done on time, on budget by the best skilled workforce in america you know, same thing with child care right now the unemployment rate in the building trades is essentially zero it's very, very low. yet every one of these fabs requires 6,000, 7,000, 8,000 construction workers to build them if you don't figure out a way to attract women to be plumbers, pipefitters, electrical engineers and such, you won't be successful so none of this is social policy this is all about pushing companies to think broadly so that we can together be
shouldn't everything, when it comes to this law, be with the goal of making it more cost affordable and getting rid of the regulatory burdens and not increasing that? >> yes, absolutely but there's a lot of evidence that using a project labor agreement on such huge facilities, like these will be, actually results in lower costs and faster completion. again, we're not requiring union, we're not requiring a project labor agreement. we are preferencing it because we know from history and...